<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newgeography.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Milwaukee</title>
 <link>http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/milwaukee</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Milwaukee: Slow Growth, But Still Dispersing</title>
 <link>http://www.newgeography.com/content/002116-milwaukee-slow-growth-but-still-dispersing</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The new 2010 census figures for Milwaukee reveal one of the  nation&#039;s slowest growing metropolitan areas. From 2000 to 2010, Milwaukee grew  3.7 percent, from 1,501,000 to 1,556,000. Milwaukee&#039;s growth rate places it in  a third place tie with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newgeography.com/content/002104-los-angeles-slowest-growth-since-late-1800s&quot;&gt;Los  Angeles&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newgeography.com/content/002108-cleveland-huge-core-loss-overwhelms-suburban-gain&quot;&gt;Cleveland&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newgeography.com/content/002112-pittsburgh-metropolitan-suburban-and-core-losses&quot;&gt;Pittsburgh&lt;/a&gt; lost population).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The historical core municipality of Milwaukee fell 0.4  percent, from 597,000 to 595,000. This is the lowest population count since the  1940 census and it is possible that the population living in the 1940  boundaries could be substantially lower. Since that time the land area of the  city has more than doubled (from 43 square miles to 97 square miles), which is  likely to have masked severe losses in the older urban core of the city (such  losses have occurred in nearly all historical core municipalities in the  nation).  The city reached its population  peak in 1960, with 741,000 residents in the expanded boundaries. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The suburbs gained 6.4 percent and attracted more than 100  percent of the population growth in the 2000s. The largest growth, at 12.1  percent, was in Washington County, which is further from the urban core than  the other two suburban counties. Waukesha added 29,000 residents, growing 8.1  percent, from 361,000 to 390,000, while Ozuakee County grew from 82,000 to  87,000, for a growth rate of 5.6 percent. The core county of Milwaukee, which  includes the city of Milwaukee, grew 0.8 percent, from 940,000 to 948,000.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.newgeography.com/content/002116-milwaukee-slow-growth-but-still-dispersing#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/census-2010">Census 2010</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/demographics">demographics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/milwaukee">Milwaukee</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/population">population</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 00:35:13 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Wendell Cox</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2116 at http://www.newgeography.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Source of Population Growth In Milwaukee</title>
 <link>http://www.newgeography.com/content/0082-source-population-growth-in-milwaukee</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Where is the growth in Wisconsin?  The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel checked in last week with a glowing review of the recent city census numbers.  Our friend, Milwaukee native, and former Playboy Magazine editor Bob Carr sends his reaction:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Milwaukee is having to put quite a spin on the latest census figures. A recent  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=770981&quot;&gt;Journal-Sentinel article&lt;/a&gt; trumpets the the city’s decade-long population plateauing as a sign of “steadiness.” Cities losing the most population in Wisconsin included Whitefish Bay, Wauwatosa, West Allis and Brown Deer. Guess what they are — Milwaukee suburbs.  With the city losing people at the edges, the newspaper was lucky enough to find someone who had actually moved from Whitefish Bay to Milwaukee to help take the sting out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/files/WI-City-Growth-2007.pdf&quot;&gt;Here&#039;s a rundown&lt;/a&gt; of the recent population trends in the State of Wisconsin.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.newgeography.com/content/0082-source-population-growth-in-milwaukee#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/demographics">demographics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/milwaukee">Milwaukee</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newgeography.com/files/WI-City-Growth-2007.pdf" length="84036" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:50:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mark Schill</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">82 at http://www.newgeography.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
