<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newgeography.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Energy</title>
 <link>http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/energy</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>How Detroit Lost the Millennials, and Maybe the Rest of Us, Too</title>
 <link>http://www.newgeography.com/content/00508-how-detroit-lost-millennials-and-maybe-rest-us-too</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The current debate over whether to save our domestic auto industry has revealed some starkly different views about the future of manufacturing in America among economists, elected officials, and corporate executives. There are many disagreements about solutions to the Big Three’s current financial difficulties, but the more fundamental debate lies in whether the industry should be bent to the will of the government’s environmental priorities or if it should serve only the needs of the companies’ customers and their shareholders.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But there’s something more at stake: the long-term credibility of Detroit among the rising generation of Millennials. These young people, after all, are the future consumers for the auto industry and winning them – or at least a significant portion of them – over is critical to the industry’s long-term prospects in the marketplace and in the halls of Congress. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newgeography.com/content/00508-how-detroit-lost-millennials-and-maybe-rest-us-too&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.newgeography.com/content/00508-how-detroit-lost-millennials-and-maybe-rest-us-too#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/financial-crisis">Financial Crisis</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/generations">Generations</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/transportation">Transportation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/energy">Energy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/environment">Environment</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/policy">Policy</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 01:14:24 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Morley Winograd and Michael D. Hais</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">508 at http://www.newgeography.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Importance of Productivity in National Transportation Policy</title>
 <link>http://www.newgeography.com/content/00495-the-importance-productivity-national-transportation-policy</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;For years, transit funding advocates have claimed that national policy favors highways over transit. Consistent with that view, Congressman James Oberstar, chairman of the powerful House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, wants to change the funding mix. He is looking for 40 percent of the transportation funding from the proposed stimulus package to be spent on transit, which is a substantial increase from present levels.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This raises two important questions: The first question is that of “equity” – “what would be the appropriate level to spend on transit?” The second question relates to “productivity” – “what would be the effect of spending more on transit?” &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newgeography.com/content/00495-the-importance-productivity-national-transportation-policy&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.newgeography.com/content/00495-the-importance-productivity-national-transportation-policy#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/urban-issues">Urban Issues</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/suburbs">Suburbs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/transportation">Transportation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/energy">Energy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/policy">Policy</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:00:49 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Wendell Cox</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">495 at http://www.newgeography.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Make Sure All That Infrastructure Spending Is Well Supported</title>
 <link>http://www.newgeography.com/content/00472-make-sure-all-that-infrastructure-spending-is-well-supported</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s the new buzzword: infrastructure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;President-elect Barack Obama has promised billions in infrastructure spending as part of a public works program bigger than any since the interstate highway system was built in the 1950s. Though it was greeted with hosannas, his proposal is only tapping into a clamor for such spending that&#039;s been rising ever since Hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans in 2005 and a major bridge collapsed in Minneapolis last year. With the economy now officially in recession, the rage for new brick and mortar is reaching a fever pitch.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But before we commit hundreds of billions to new construction projects, we should focus on just what kind of infrastructure investment we should – and shouldn&#039;t – be making.  &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newgeography.com/content/00472-make-sure-all-that-infrastructure-spending-is-well-supported&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.newgeography.com/content/00472-make-sure-all-that-infrastructure-spending-is-well-supported#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/financial-crisis">Financial Crisis</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/economics">Economics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/heartland">Heartland</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/transportation">Transportation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/energy">Energy</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:05:44 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Joel Kotkin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">472 at http://www.newgeography.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>New Zealand Voters Swing Right: John Key&#039;s Shower Power</title>
 <link>http://www.newgeography.com/content/00445-new-zealand-voters-swing-right-john-keys-shower-power</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Reason&lt;/i&gt; magazine’s Jesse Walker opens his commentary on the New Zealand election by saying:  “At least one country is responding to the financial crisis by moving to the right, not left.” This is factually correct but may overstate the case. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newgeography.com/content/00445-new-zealand-voters-swing-right-john-keys-shower-power&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.newgeography.com/content/00445-new-zealand-voters-swing-right-john-keys-shower-power#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/urban-issues">Urban Issues</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/economics">Economics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/energy">Energy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/environment">Environment</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 22:37:35 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Owen McShane</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">445 at http://www.newgeography.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Up Next: The War of the Regions?</title>
 <link>http://www.newgeography.com/content/00424-up-next-the-war-regions</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;By &lt;a href=&quot;/users/joel-kotkin&quot;&gt;Joel Kotkin&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;/users/mark-schill&quot;&gt;Mark Schill&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s time to throw away red, blue and purple, left and right, and get to the real and traditional crux of American politics: the battle for resources between the country’s many diverse regions. How President-elect Barack Obama balances these divergent geographic interests may have more to do with his long-term success than his ideological stance or media image. Personal charm is transitory; the struggle for money and jobs has a more permanent character. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newgeography.com/content/00424-up-next-the-war-regions&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.newgeography.com/content/00424-up-next-the-war-regions#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/financial-crisis">Financial Crisis</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/economics">Economics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/heartland">Heartland</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/energy">Energy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/environment">Environment</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/policy">Policy</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.newgeography.com/files/states-of-industry_War-of-regions.pdf" length="96064" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 02:52:22 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Joel Kotkin and Mark Schill</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">424 at http://www.newgeography.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Change We Need - Part II: Will We Sustain The Current Economy, Or Create A Sustainable Economy?</title>
 <link>http://www.newgeography.com/content/00417-the-change-we-need-part-ii-will-we-sustain-the-current-economy-or-create-a-sustainable</link>
 <description>&lt;div style=&quot;font-size: 10px; font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: 1.35em;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Yesterday, Rick Cole &lt;a href=&quot;/content/00406-the-change-we-need-will-we-sustain-the-current-economy-or-create-a-sustainable-economy&quot;&gt;discussed the theoretical basis for the most effective kinds of economic change&lt;/a&gt;.  Today, he provides specific suggestions. – The Editors&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No brief outline can do justice to weaving together the potentially convergent strands that compose the key elements of the remaking of the American economy.  None of the policy prescriptions here are original, but it is important to see them as complimentary parts of a larger whole: &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newgeography.com/content/00417-the-change-we-need-part-ii-will-we-sustain-the-current-economy-or-create-a-sustainable&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.newgeography.com/content/00417-the-change-we-need-part-ii-will-we-sustain-the-current-economy-or-create-a-sustainable#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/economics">Economics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/energy">Energy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/environment">Environment</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 16:05:57 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Rick Cole</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">417 at http://www.newgeography.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Change We Need:   Will We Sustain The Current Economy, Or Create A Sustainable Economy? Part I</title>
 <link>http://www.newgeography.com/content/00406-the-change-we-need-will-we-sustain-the-current-economy-or-create-a-sustainable-economy</link>
 <description>&lt;div style=&quot;font-size: 10px; font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: 1.35em;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;B&gt;The Change We Need&lt;/B&gt; will run in two parts.  In Part I, Rick Cole lays out the kinds of changes we need, and why.  Part II &lt;a href=&quot;/content/00417-the-change-we-need-part-ii-will-we-sustain-the-current-economy-or-create-a-sustainable&quot;&gt;outlines his specific policy prescriptions&lt;/a&gt;.- The Editors&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Will this historic election alter the American physical landscape as well as the electoral one?  Much will depend on whether the Obama Administration will focus on trying to revive the economy or move to reshape it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bold leadership sounds great in the abstract, but embarking on profound changes in the economy is both politically risky and economically daunting.  Government, especially the one the new president will inherit, is severely limited in its competence and capacity to reshape the American share of the global economy.   &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newgeography.com/content/00406-the-change-we-need-will-we-sustain-the-current-economy-or-create-a-sustainable-economy&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.newgeography.com/content/00406-the-change-we-need-will-we-sustain-the-current-economy-or-create-a-sustainable-economy#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/economics">Economics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/small-cities">Small Cities</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/energy">Energy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/environment">Environment</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 23:05:51 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Rick Cole</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">406 at http://www.newgeography.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Two-Timing Telecommute Taxes</title>
 <link>http://www.newgeography.com/content/00392-two-timing-telecommute-taxes</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Telecommuting — or telework — is a critical tool that can help employees, businesses and communities weather the current financial crisis, and thrive afterward.  However, right now, the nation is burdened with a powerful threat to the growth of telework:  the telecommuter tax.  This tax is a state penalty imposed on Americans who work for employers outside their home states and sometimes telecommute.       &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newgeography.com/content/00392-two-timing-telecommute-taxes&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.newgeography.com/content/00392-two-timing-telecommute-taxes#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/financial-crisis">Financial Crisis</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/economics">Economics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/urban-issues/new-york">New York</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/suburbs">Suburbs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/transportation">Transportation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/energy">Energy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/environment">Environment</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/policy">Policy</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 23:36:58 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nicole Belson Goluboff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">392 at http://www.newgeography.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Appalachia and Energy</title>
 <link>http://www.newgeography.com/content/00361-appalachia-and-energy</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;When I think of the energy crisis, I cannot help but think of the poignant story of Martin Toler. A victim of the Sago Mine disaster, he was found sitting alongside his 12 fellow miners in darkness. Deep in the heart of the earth he wrote a note to his family as air and time was running out: “Tell all that I’ll see them on the other side,” read the note found lying beside his body. “It wasn’t bad. I just went to sleep. I love you.” &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newgeography.com/content/00361-appalachia-and-energy&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.newgeography.com/content/00361-appalachia-and-energy#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/heartland">Heartland</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/energy">Energy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/environment">Environment</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 04:52:06 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Sylvia L. Lovely</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">361 at http://www.newgeography.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Regulating People or Regulating Greenhouse Gases?</title>
 <link>http://www.newgeography.com/content/00356-regulating-people-or-regulating-greenhouse-gases</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It seems very likely that a national greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction standard will be established by legislation in the next year. Interest groups are lining up with various proposals, some fairly benign and others potentially devastating.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One of the most frequently mentioned strategies – mandatory vehicle miles reductions – is also among the most destructive. It is predictably supported by the same interests that have pushed the anti-automobile (and anti-suburban) agenda for years, often under the moniker of “smart growth.”  &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newgeography.com/content/00356-regulating-people-or-regulating-greenhouse-gases&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.newgeography.com/content/00356-regulating-people-or-regulating-greenhouse-gases#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/urban-issues">Urban Issues</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/suburbs">Suburbs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/transportation">Transportation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/energy">Energy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/story-topics/environment">Environment</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 23:02:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Wendell Cox</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">356 at http://www.newgeography.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
