<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newgeography.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Denver</title>
 <link>http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/denver</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Seattle, Denver &amp; Portland: Slowing Growth Rates &amp; Convergence</title>
 <link>http://www.newgeography.com/content/002073-seattle-denver-portland-slowing-growth-rates-convergence</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Just released 2010 Census data indicates that the growth  rates of the Seattle, Denver and Portland metropolitan areas fell significantly  in the 2000s compared to the 1990s.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Seattle: &lt;/strong&gt;Seattle  metropolitan area population growth fell to 13 percent in the 2000s compared to  19 percent in the 1990s. The metropolitan area population in 2010 was  3,439,000, up from 3,041,000 in 2000. The historical core municipality of  Seattle grew eight percent between 2000 and 2010 (from 563,000 to 608,000),  while the suburbs grew 14 percent. The suburbs attracted 89 percent of the metropolitan  population growth.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Denver: &lt;/strong&gt;The  Denver metropolitan area experienced a decline in growth rate from 32 percent  to 17 percent, while the population increased from 2,179,000 to 2,543,000. The  historical core municipality of Denver grew eight percent, from 554,000 to  600,000. The suburbs grew 20 percent and accounted for 83 percent of the  metropolitan area population growth.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Portland: &lt;/strong&gt;In the  Portland Metropolitan area growth declined to 15 percent from 27 percent, with  a population rising from 1,928,000 to 2,226,000. The historical core  municipality of Portland grew 10 percent (from 529,002 583,000), while the  suburbs gained 17 percent. The suburbs attracted 82 percent of the metropolitan  population growth.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Convergence: &lt;/strong&gt;These  slower population growth rates indicate a convergence with the growth rates  achieved by middle American metropolitan areas for which data is available.  Indianapolis grew 15 percent and Oklahoma City grew 14 percent, more than  Seattle and slightly less than Denver and Portland.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.newgeography.com/content/002073-seattle-denver-portland-slowing-growth-rates-convergence#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/census-2010">Census 2010</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/demographics">demographics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/denver">Denver</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/population">population</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/portland">Portland</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/seattle">Seattle</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 00:16:25 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Wendell Cox</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2073 at http://www.newgeography.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
