<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newgeography.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Minneapolis</title>
 <link>http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/minneapolis</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Biking in Minneapolis</title>
 <link>http://www.newgeography.com/content/002274-biking-minneapolis</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The sustainable biking craze seems to keep rolling as more  and more cities encourage commuters and wanderers to bike across town instead  of drive. New programs, such as &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.niceridemn.org/&quot;&gt;Nice Ride&lt;/a&gt; in Minneapolis, offer an innovative service where one can rent out a bike for a  small fee and ride it across town to other stations, or continue to hold onto  the bike and continue making payments.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Other cities are turning their spokes with similar programs:  B-Cycle in Denver, a program in D.C., and Bixi in Montreal all have enough  riders to sustain the businesses. While profit from these bikes may be viable,  the question of sustainability and more improved quality of life still remains. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The way Nice Ride functions is endearingly simple: one signs  up for a fixed subscription (with discounts for university students) and  receives a special key that can be used at any Nice Ride station. The user  slips in the key, and unlocks a bike. The bike can then be ridden across town  to any station in the city, any time from April to November. In June 2010 when  Nice Ride began, this simple plan garnered 10,000 trips in in its first month  of use. So has this new model (and increased biking in general) for urban  transportation provided any gains for the public other than fatigued legs? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It seems that the program is a perfect fit for the city’s  infrastructure. The city already has 46 miles of on-street bike lanes and 84  miles of bike trails to support such a project. On top of this, the city’s  bicycle culture is one of the strongest in the nation, second only to Portland,  whose more temperate climate has an edge for those cyclists hoping to commute  regularly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Something that both cities have experienced is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bikeleague.org/blog/2011/02/ridership-up-crashes-down-safety-in-numbers-in-minneapolis/&quot;&gt;drop  in bicycle/motor vehicle crashes&lt;/a&gt; as more and more people decide to utilize  biking as their main source of transportation. This “safety in numbers” concept  has potentially attracted more and more cyclists each year leading to not only a  wider understanding of the bicycle culture present, but safer roads as respect  is paid to the cyclists braving the busy roads of Minneapolis and St. Paul as  well.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The biking craze in the Twin Cities has also lead to the  area being one of the cleanest cities in the world according to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forbes.com/2007/04/16/worlds-cleanest-cities-biz-logistics-cx_rm_0416cleanest_slide_6.html?thisSpeed=undefined&quot;&gt;an  article featured in Forbes&lt;/a&gt;. The research examined many different facets of a  city’s infrastructure, including the emphasis the city places upon  transportation, including biking. The article cites the city’s extensive use of  bike lanes (as well as its transit and bus systems) as the major reason the  Minneapolis/St. Paul area is so clean. The Twin Cities ranked fifth on the  list, behind the likes of Calgary, Honolulu, Helsinki, and Ottawa. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So while other cities may stick to the classic emphasis on  automobiles, Minneapolis has shown that biking is not only a safe mode of  transportation, but one that can help to clean up the urban environment as  well. Not to mention the cult cycling craze that many biking cities possess  seemingly unifies an active demographic into a hopeful mode for future American  transportation. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.newgeography.com/content/002274-biking-minneapolis#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/bicycles">bicycles</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/minneapolis">Minneapolis</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/transportation">transportation</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 23:12:32 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jacob Langenfeld</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2274 at http://www.newgeography.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Twin Cities Growth All in Suburbs</title>
 <link>http://www.newgeography.com/content/002133-twin-cities-growth-all-suburbs</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newgeography.com/content/002123-perspectives-urban-cores-and-suburbs&quot;&gt;historical  core municipalities&lt;/a&gt; of the Twin Cities area, Minneapolis and St. Paul  experienced modest population declines between 2000 and 2010, according to the  latest census count. All of the growth in the metropolitan area was in the  suburbs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan (Minnesota-Wisconsin) area  grew from 2,969,000 in 2000 to 3,280,000 in 2010, an increase of 10.5 percent.  The city of Minneapolis lost 40 residents, with a population of 382,618 in 2000  and 382,578 in 2010. The city of St. Paul lost 2,000 residents, from 287,000 to  285,000. Both historic core cities reached their population peaks in 1950, at  522,000 in Minneapolis and 311,000 in St. Paul. Each of the core cities have  maintained essentially the same boundaries (city limits) as in 1950.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The suburbs grew 13.6 percent. The strongest growth was in  Scott County (MN) at 45 percent, Wright County (MN) at 38 percent,  Sherburne County (MN) at 37 percent, St. Croix  County (WI) at 34 percent, Chisago County (MN) at 31 percent and Carver County  (MN) at 30 percent. These counties combined to attract nearly one-half of the  population growth, despite accounting for less than 15 percent of the  population in 2000, indicating the continuing dispersion of the Twin Cities.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.newgeography.com/content/002133-twin-cities-growth-all-suburbs#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/census-2010">Census 2010</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/demographics">demographics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/minneapolis">Minneapolis</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/minnesota">minnesota</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/population">population</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/st-paul">St. Paul</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2011 13:14:57 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Wendell Cox</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2133 at http://www.newgeography.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Minneapolis, St. Paul &amp; Memphis Core City Losses</title>
 <link>http://www.newgeography.com/content/002127-minneapolis-st-paul-memphis-core-city-losses</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Census results released today show again show losses, though small, in historical core municipalities. The city of Minneapolis lost 40 people, between 2000 and 2010, falling from 382,618 to 382,578. The city of St. Paul, also a historical core city of the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area fell from 287,000 to 285,000.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The historical core municipality of Memphis dropped from 650,000 to 647,000, despite the fact that much of the city is of a post-World War II suburban form.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.newgeography.com/content/002127-minneapolis-st-paul-memphis-core-city-losses#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/census-2010">Census 2010</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/demographics">demographics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/memphis">Memphis</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/minneapolis">Minneapolis</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/minnesota">minnesota</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/population">population</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/st-paul">St. Paul</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/tennessee">Tennessee</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 22:40:05 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Wendell Cox</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2127 at http://www.newgeography.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
