<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newgeography.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Nashville</title>
 <link>http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/nashville</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Mixed Performance in Suburbanized Core Cities of Tennessee and Kentucky</title>
 <link>http://www.newgeography.com/content/002136-mixed-performance-suburbanized-core-cities-tennessee-and-kentucky</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;New 2010 census data for the highly suburbanized historic  core municipalities of the major metropolitan areas of Tennessee and Kentucky  indicates mixed results. The historic core municipality of Louisville  (Louisville/Jefferson County) captured just under one half of the metropolitan  area’s growth, yet grew more slowly than the historic core municipality of  Nashville/Davidson County, which captured 20 percent of the metropolitan area’s  growth. The historic core municipality of Memphis, which annexed substantial  suburban areas, experienced a loss.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The majority of population growth was in the suburbs in all  three metropolitan areas.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Nashville: &lt;/strong&gt;The  Nashville (Tennessee) metropolitan area grew 21 percent, from 1,312,000 in 2000  to 1,590,000 in 2010, according to the recent census count. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newgeography.com/content/002123-perspectives-urban-cores-and-suburbs&quot;&gt;historical  core municipality&lt;/a&gt; (city of Nashville) grew from 570,000 to 627,000, for a  growth rate of 10 percent. The city of Nashville is combined with Davidson  County and is of a largely suburban form, and includes rural areas. Between  1960 and 1970, the consolidation increased Nashville’s land area nearly 20  fold, from 29 square miles to 508 square miles, while the population less than  tripled. Nashville/Davidson County covers 1.6 times the land area of the city  of New York, which has more than 10 times the population. Nashville/Davidson  County captured 20 percent of the metropolitan area growth, above the average  thus far of less than 10 percent.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Growing at a rate of nearly 30 percent, the suburbs captured  80 percent of the metropolitan area growth. The suburbs account for nearly 40  percent of the metropolitan population. Williamson and Rutherford counties were  the fastest growing, at approximately 45 percent. Combined, the two counties  represented one-half of the metropolitan area growth.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Louisville: &lt;/strong&gt;The  Louisville (Kentucky-Indiana) metropolitan area grew 9 percent, from 1,162,000  in 2000 to 1,267,000 in 2010, according to the recent census count. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newgeography.com/content/002123-perspectives-urban-cores-and-suburbs&quot;&gt;historical  core municipality&lt;/a&gt; (the combined city of Louisville and Jefferson County)  grew from 693,000 to 741,000, for a growth rate of 7 percent. The city of  Louisville is combined with Jefferson County and is of a largely suburban form,  and includes rural areas. Between 2000 and 2010, the consolidation increased  Louisville’s land area five times, from 62 square miles to 385 square miles,  while the population nearly tripled. Louisville/Jefferson County covers nearly  three times the land area of the city of Philadelphia, which has a population  twice as large. Louisville/Jefferson County captured 45 percent of the  metropolitan area growth, well above the average thus far of less than 10  percent.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The suburbs grew at rate of 12 percent and captured 55 percent  of the metropolitan area. Suburban Desoto County, Mississippi grew by 50  percent and accounted for one-half of the metropolitan area’s growth.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;  &lt;strong&gt;Memphis: &lt;/strong&gt;Memphis (Tennessee-Mississippi-Arkansas)  was alone among the major metropolitan areas with historic core municipalities  in Kentucky and Tennessee that lost population between 2000 and 2010.  The 2000 population for the present land area  of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newgeography.com/content/002123-perspectives-urban-cores-and-suburbs&quot;&gt;historical  core municipality&lt;/a&gt;, the city of Memphis declined six percent, from 691,000  to 647,000. The city of Memphis has a principally post-World War II urban form,  having expanded its land area more than 150 percent, and covers more than five  times the land area of the larger city of San Francisco. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overall, the Memphis metropolitan area grew from 1,205,000  in 2000 to 1,316,000 in 2010, a growth rate of 9 percent, slightly below the  national average. The suburbs grew 21 percent and captured all of the growth.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.newgeography.com/content/002136-mixed-performance-suburbanized-core-cities-tennessee-and-kentucky#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/census-2010">Census 2010</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/demographics">demographics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/kentucky">Kentucky</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/louisville">Louisville</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/memphis">Memphis</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/nashville">Nashville</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/population">population</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/tennessee">Tennessee</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2011 16:58:38 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Wendell Cox</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2136 at http://www.newgeography.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
