<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newgeography.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Sunrail</title>
 <link>http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/sunrail</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Exaggerating in Orlando: Sunrail</title>
 <link>http://www.newgeography.com/content/002286-exaggerating-orlando-sunrail</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;For decades taxpayers have paid billions to finance major  transportation project cost overruns far exceeding the routinely low-ball  forecasts available at approval time. This has been documented in a wide body  of academic literature, the most important of which was conducted by Bent  Flyvbjerg of Oxford University, Nils Bruzelius University of Stockholm and  Werner Rothengatter of the University of Karlsruhe in Germany (&lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0521009464?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;tag=newgeogrcom-20&amp;amp;linkCode=as2&amp;amp;camp=1789&amp;amp;creative=390957&amp;amp;creativeASIN=0521009464&quot;&gt;Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Major project advocacy, however, has descended to a new low  of unprecedented and absurd exaggeration. This is evident in the current public  policy debate about the Sunrail commuter rail project in Orlando. Two examples  make the point&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Exaggeration #1: Job  Creation: &lt;/strong&gt;The Central Florida Partnership claims that Sunrail will create 10,000   jobs. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.centralfloridapartnership.org/news/2011/05/23/headlines/em-sunrail-em-what-s-in-it-for-me-update/&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;almost  immediately.&amp;quot;&lt;/a&gt; This would be quite an accomplishment. The Sunrail  project is currently projected to cost approximately $850 million for just the  first segment. Every cent of the likely cost overruns will be on a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newgeography.com/content/002272-orlando%E2%80%99s-sunrail-blank-checks-induced-washington&quot;&gt;blank  check&lt;/a&gt; drawn the account of Florida taxpayers. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At Sunrail&#039;s claimed rate of job creation,  the Obama Administration&#039;s $800 million &amp;quot;shovel  ready&amp;quot; stimulus program (enacted in 2009), would have &amp;quot;almost  immediately&amp;quot; produced more than nine million jobs. By now, the unemployment  rate would have been reduced to little above 2 percent, lower than at any point  in the more than 60 years of available data. Of course, and predictably, the  stimulus program did no such thing, not least because a job created by public  spending is likely to destroy more than one sustainable job in the private  sector.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;  &lt;strong&gt;Exaggeration #2:  Sunrail Will Make a Difference: &lt;/strong&gt;The proponents imply that Sunrail will  carry a significant number of trips in the Orlando area, claiming that the line  will carry one lane of freeway traffic and that it will give central Florida  residents an alternative to high gasoline prices. In fact, even if Sun Rail  reaches its ridership projections, it would take a &lt;em&gt;full day&lt;/em&gt; of train travel to remove &lt;em&gt;less than&lt;/em&gt; an &lt;em&gt;hour&#039;s &lt;/em&gt;peak  hour freeway volume. Needless to say, no one will notice any fewer cars on the  freeway (Figure).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=http://www.newgeography.com/files/cox-sunrail.png&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Further, Sunrail will not provide an alternative to the  overwhelming majority of central Floridians, since it will attract only 1,850  new round-trip riders per day by 2030 (Sunrail&#039;s number). Spending $850 million  on Sunrail is the same as the taxpayers giving each new rider a gift of  $450,000.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Need to Set  Rational Priorities: &lt;/strong&gt;All of this is occurring in the face of an national  fiscal crisis so severe that even the AARP has expressed its willingness to  consider cuts to Social Security. As an AARP spokesperson put it &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/18/us/18aarp.html&quot;&gt;You  have to look at all the tradeoffs&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;quot; Indeed.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.newgeography.com/content/002286-exaggerating-orlando-sunrail#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/cars">cars</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/florida">Florida</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/orlando">Orlando</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/rail">rail</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/sunrail">Sunrail</category>
 <category domain="http://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/transportation">transportation</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 12:37:03 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Wendell Cox</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2286 at http://www.newgeography.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
