<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.newgeography.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Construction</title>
 <link>https://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/construction</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Single Family Houses Sales Up, Builders Register Confidence</title>
 <link>https://www.newgeography.com/content/003248-single-family-houses-sales-up-builders-register-confidence</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A continuing increase in new single-family house sales has  fueled the substantial increase in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nahb.org/news_details.aspx?sectionID=134&amp;amp;newsID=15597&quot;&gt;NAHB/Wells  Fargo Housing Market Index&lt;/a&gt; (HMI) to 46 in November. This indicates that  nearly one half of surveyed home builders are positive about future sales of  single family houses. This is a strong increase from the HMI of 41 in October.  The HMI had reached its low point in the midst of the housing bus in January  2009 at 8 and is now higher than at any point in more than six years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NAHB reported that national single-family house sales in  September were nearly 30% above the September 2011 rate, though remained  approximately one-half the 2007 rate. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realtor.org/news-releases/2012/10/existing-home-sales-rise-in-october-with-ongoing-price-and-equity-gains&quot;&gt;National  Association of Realtors also reported&lt;/a&gt; that single family houses continued  to dominate existing house sales, garnering approximately 88% of sales in  October.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The strengthening of the single-family housing market Is to  be expected as the economy improves. These developments are further indication  that the claimed change in housing preferences from single-family to  multifamily is not occurring. In a related development, the latest available  data indicates a preference in California for single-family housing on  conventional sized lots, which is described in &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newgeography.com/content/003224-a-housing-preference-sea-change-not-california&quot;&gt;A  Housing Preference Sea Change: Not in California&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>https://www.newgeography.com/content/003248-single-family-houses-sales-up-builders-register-confidence#comments</comments>
 <category domain="https://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/construction">Construction</category>
 <category domain="https://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/housing">housing</category>
 <category domain="https://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/housing-market">housing market</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 17:26:35 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Wendell Cox</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3248 at https://www.newgeography.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Decline in Construction and its Effect on Gender</title>
 <link>https://www.newgeography.com/content/00920-decline-construction-and-its-effect-gender</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Unemployment in the construction sector increased by 79,000 in June, according to a report The Associated General Contractors of America released earlier this month. Over the past year, &lt;a href= http://www.agc.org/cs/news_media/press_room/press_release?pressrelease.id=387&gt;that number has grown to 992,000&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Even more alarming is the disparity between the construction worker unemployment rate, over 17.4 percent, and the national average for all sectors, around 9.7. Construction employment is crumbling before our eyes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The current economic climate has not proven friendly to construction on the whole as state and local revenue continues to decline and little demand for commercial or retail facilities, as well as shrinking orders for new facilities, puts construction in a perilous zone.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Though as recent as last November, President-elect Obama had conjured up a &lt;a href=http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/016/659dkrod.asp?pg=1&gt;program to rebuild the nation’s infrastructure&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The $787 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act would modernize roads, bridges, schools, and public transportation – among other things – and reinvigorate the floundering construction and manufacturing industries. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, this “shovel ready” stimulus plan did not sit well with women’s groups who wanted nothing to do with a stimulus package that only created jobs for “burly men.” &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These women’s groups seemed to misjudge the president-elects original plan designed to “stop the hemorrhaging in construction and manufacturing while investing in physical infrastructure that is indispensable for long-term economic growth” and instead turned the stimulus into an issue of gender politics. But from the first complaint, onward, the construction and manufacturing industries stood no chance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Obama changed his plan, adding health, education, and “other human infrastructure components” to his proposal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A report entitled “The Job Impact of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan” released on January 10, estimated that the number of jobs created that were likely to go to women was around 42%, a non-too disheartening figure when women “held only 20 percent of the jobs lost in the recession.” The report concluded that the stimulus package would now “skew job creation somewhat towards women.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.newgeography.com/content/00919-us-construction-employment-1939-june-2009&gt;&lt;img src=http://www.newgeography.com/files/imagecache/Chart_fullnodeview/chartimages/construction-june-09.png&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The act was signed into law on February 17 and over the past four and a half months some unfortunate figures have appeared. As noted previously, the construction industry is in a downfall, while there is a growing discrepancy between female unemployment rate (8 percent) and male unemployment rate (10.5 percent) – the highest male-female jobless rate gap in the history of the BLS [Labor Department] data back to 1948.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All this data, however, has pushed the issue of gender-politics above the issue of human need.   Now which group of people should make their voices heard? Let’s hear from women in the construction industry.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="https://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/construction">Construction</category>
 <category domain="https://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/economics">Economics</category>
 <category domain="https://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/recession">Recession</category>
 <category domain="https://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/unemployment">unemployment</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:27:04 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ian Lausa</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">920 at https://www.newgeography.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
