<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.newgeography.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>IRS</title>
 <link>https://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/irs</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>IRS to Continue Migration Data</title>
 <link>https://www.newgeography.com/content/003330-irs-continue-migration-data</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot; The IRS should be applauded&amp;quot; --- it is hard to  imagine a public statement to this effect, other than from a government  insider. But this was the Tax Foundation, improbably and correctly  complimenting the &lt;a href=&quot;http://taxfoundation.org/blog/irs-reverses-course-will-continue-providing-migration-data?utm_source=feedburner&amp;amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;amp;utm_campaign=Feed%253A+TaxPolicyBlog+%2528Tax+Foundation+-+Tax+Foundation%2527s+%2522Tax+Policy+Blog%2522%2529&quot;&gt;Internal  Revenue Service in announcing that its annual income tax migration data would  continue to be produced&lt;/a&gt;. This apparently reverses a decision to discontinue  the data. The Tax Foundation noted that there was:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;... outrage when the IRS announced  that they were canceling the program. An IRS economist, informed of the  decision by higher-ups, told the Daily Caller: &amp;quot;We were just told this  morning that the program is indeed going to be discontinued.  It is not our decision at all and we are very  disappointed.&amp;quot; Jim Pettit, of the activist group Change Maryland, penned a  National Review piece noting that the decision came soon after the data put  Maryland Governor Martin O&#039;Malley on the defensive (O&#039;Malley has routinely  asserted that Maryland has a great tax system and business climate, despite  strong evidence to the contrary), and the Washington Examiner followed up with  an editorial saying that the data is vital for ascertaining which  &amp;quot;model&amp;quot; of states (high-tax, high-service vs. low-tax, low-service)  Americans were preferring. Members of Congress also started calling, demanding  an explanation. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We join in the chorus. This data has been valuable for many  uses and many will continue to use it in the years to come.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>https://www.newgeography.com/content/003330-irs-continue-migration-data#comments</comments>
 <category domain="https://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/data">data</category>
 <category domain="https://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/irs">IRS</category>
 <category domain="https://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/migration">migration</category>
 <category domain="https://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/taxes">taxes</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 14:22:44 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Wendell Cox</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3330 at https://www.newgeography.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
