Large Cities Information Jobs - 2015 Best Cities Rankings

Read about how we selected the 2015 Best Cities for Job Growth

We used five measures of growth to rank MSAs over the past 10 years. “Large” areas include those with a current nonfarm employment base of at least 450,000 jobs. “Midsize” areas range from 150,000 to 450,000 jobs. “Small” areas have as many as 150,000 jobs. This year’s rankings reflect the new Office of Management and Budget definitions of MSAs for all series released after March 2015. As a result, the MSA listed in this year’s rankings do not necessary correspond directly to those listed in prior years. In some instances, MSAs were consolidated with others — for example Pascagoula, MS, was combined with the Gulfport-Biloxi, MS, MSA to form the new Gulfport-Biloxi-Pascagoula, MS, MSA. Others were separated from previously consolidated MSAs and in still other instances individual counties were shifted from one MSA to another. The bottom line is that this year’s rankings are based on good time series for the newly defined MSAs but may not be precisely comparable to those listed in prior years. The total number of MSAs included in this year’s rankings has risen from 398 to 421. This year’s rankings reflect the current size of each MSA’s employment.







2014 MSA Info  Ranking - LARGE MSAs Area 2015 Weighted INDEX 2014 Nonfarm Emplymt (1000s) 2014 Info Emplymt Total Information Emplymt Cum Growth 2009-2014 2015  Change from 2014 - Large MSAs
1 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 98.2   1,031.5    70.9 60.2% 0
2 San Francisco-Redwood City-South San Francisco, CA Met Div 97.2   1,034.2    55.8 51.3% 1
3 Austin-Round Rock, TX 91.9      924.9    25.8 30.8% (1)
4 Raleigh, NC 86.1      571.5    19.0 13.8% 7
5 Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC 85.3   1,085.8    25.1 12.7% 12
6 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 81.1   1,900.0    34.6 25.2% (2)
7 New York City, NY 79.1   4,165.9  185.2 13.0% (2)
8 San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX 78.7      960.3    21.8 17.0% (1)
9 Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA Met Div 78.4   1,575.6    91.8 9.2% 1
10 Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, MI Met Div 76.2   1,182.7    20.7 7.1% 10
11 Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise, NV 76.1      896.8    10.3 11.2% 15
12 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA 75.5   2,551.7    88.3 12.7% 4
13 Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA 74.1   1,090.5    24.1 5.9% 1
14 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA NECTA Div 72.7   1,742.0    55.9 5.1% (8)
15 Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach-Deerfield Beach, FL Met Div 72.6      796.1    19.0 15.6% 0
16 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL 71.1   1,135.7    24.5 2.5% 6
17 West Palm Beach-Boca Raton-Delray Beach, FL Met Div 70.8      576.2    10.2 13.0% 7
18 Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, IN 70.1   1,006.9    16.8 6.3% (5)
19 Salt Lake City, UT 69.8      666.2    18.5 12.6% (10)
20 Miami-Miami Beach-Kendall, FL Met Div 67.0   1,114.8    19.2 7.1% 14
21 Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN 67.0      892.0    20.8 4.5% (2)
22 Bergen-Hudson-Passaic, NJ 66.7      895.1    19.3 -0.3% 32
23 Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX Met Div 66.3   2,346.3    68.8 2.8% (2)
24 Louisville/Jefferson County, KY-IN 64.5      642.4       9.4 0.0% 3
25 Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT NECTA 63.4      571.3    11.4 0.3% 3
26 St. Louis, MO-IL 63.0   1,314.3    29.0 -2.9% (1)
27 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI 62.6      521.2       5.3 2.6% (4)
28 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA Met Div 61.4   4,295.6  197.6 3.5% (16)
29 Chicago-Naperville-Arlington Heights, IL Met Div 60.7   3,597.7    71.3 0.4% 4
30 Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO 59.0   1,364.0    43.8 -0.1% 1
31 New Orleans-Metairie, LA 57.8      566.2       8.4 29.4% (13)
32 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 56.0   1,903.7    39.6 -2.1% (3)
33 Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX 55.5   2,973.6    32.7 -3.2% (10)
34 Middlesex-Monmouth-Ocean, NJ 53.2      845.9    17.5 -3.7% not ranked
35 Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls, NY 52.9      556.7       7.6 -5.4% 5
36 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 52.1   1,224.2    25.7 -2.4% 1
37 San Diego-Carlsbad, CA 51.8   1,372.3    24.8 -4.6% 16
38 Philadelphia City, PA 51.6      684.3    11.5 -7.0% 3
39 Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN 51.1   1,047.8    13.5 -5.4% (7)
40 Columbus, OH 50.5   1,028.2    17.0 1.6% (32)
41 Northern Virginia, VA 50.2   1,388.0    41.3 -4.1% 10
42 Memphis, TN-MS-AR 48.4      622.5       6.1 -7.1% 3
43 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Met Div 47.9   2,560.7    63.0 -3.9% 6
44 Pittsburgh, PA 47.1   1,164.6    18.3 -6.3% (6)
45 Camden, NJ Met Div 46.6      515.3       7.2 -6.9% 20
46 Silver Spring-Frederick-Rockville, MD Met Div 46.6      576.2    13.4 -8.4% 10
47 Rochester, NY 46.1      527.8       8.9 -8.9% 16
48 Providence-Warwick, RI-MA NECTA 46.1      568.7    10.1 -9.0% 4
49 Jacksonville, FL 43.6      633.5       9.1 -11.1% (6)
50 Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI 40.7      845.7    14.4 -11.1% (4)
51 Anaheim-Santa Ana-Irvine, CA Met Div 39.3   1,524.2    23.9 -7.3% (21)
52 Cleveland-Elyria, OH 38.7   1,038.2    14.5 -9.9% (10)
53 Oakland-Hayward-Berkeley, CA Met Div 37.6   1,081.5    21.3 -13.6% 9
54 Richmond, VA 37.4      638.1       7.9 -17.8% 6
55 Kansas City, MO 36.8      571.7    14.5 -13.0% 3
56 Montgomery County-Bucks County-Chester County, PA Met Div 36.2   1,024.8    20.6 -14.3% not ranked
57 Oklahoma City, OK 34.1      625.8       8.3 -18.6% 9
58 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC 33.5      753.9    11.0 -13.9% 1
59 Newark, NJ-PA Met Div 32.8   1,188.1    24.2 -13.3% (2)
60 Detroit-Dearborn-Livonia, MI Met Div 32.4      734.4       7.0 -12.8% (21)
61 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 28.1   1,319.1    11.1 -20.7% (13)
62 Fort Worth-Arlington, TX Met Div 27.9      993.0    13.0 -14.9% (7)
63 Orange-Rockland-Westchester, NY 23.9      688.8    13.2 -16.8% not ranked
64 Birmingham-Hoover, AL 23.7      516.4       8.2 -16.9% (14)
65 Nassau County-Suffolk County, NY Met Div 22.8   1,292.3    21.4 -18.7% (21)
66 Sacramento--Roseville--Arden-Arcade, CA 19.5      902.1    13.6 -24.0% (2)
Subjects: