The Heartland Will Play a Huge Role in America's Future

fargo.jpg

One of the least anticipated developments in the nation’s 21st-century geography will be the resurgence of the American Heartland, often dismissed by coastal dwellers as “flyover country.”

Yet in the coming 40 years, as America’s population reaches 400 million, the American Heartland particularly the vast region between the Rocky Mountains and the Mississippi will gain in importance.

To fully appreciate this opportunity, Americans need to see the Heartland as far more than a rural or an agricultural zone. Although food production will remain a crucial component of its economy, high-tech services, communications, energy production, manufacturing and warehouses will serve as the critical levers for new employment and wealth creation.

This contradicts the common media portrayal of the Great Plains as a kind of Mad Max environment a postmodern, desiccated, lost world of emptying towns, meth labs and militant Native Americans about to reclaim a place best left to the forces of nature.

Some environmentalists and academics even have embraced the idea, popularized by New Jersey academics Frank J. Popper and Deborah Popper, that Washington, D.C., accelerate the depopulation of the Plains and create “the ultimate national park.” Their suggestion is that the government return the land and communities to a “buffalo commons.”

Yet ironically, the future of the Heartland particularly its cities will be tied, in part, to growing migration from the expensive, crowded coasts. Already, the growth capacity for “mega- cities” like New York, Chicago and Los Angeles may be approaching their limits as the urban megalopolis of cities, suburbs and exurbs become more crowded and expensive.

As huge urbanized regions become less desirable or unaffordable for many businesses and middle-class families, more and more Americans will find their best future in the wide-open spaces that, even in 2050, will still exist across the continent. The beneficiaries will include places as diverse as Fargo and Sioux Falls in the Dakotas to Des Moines, Oklahoma City, Omaha and Kansas City.

Many of these areas are now enjoying both population growth and net domestic in-migration even as the nation’s most ballyhooed “hip cool” regions like the Bay Area, Los Angeles, New York City and Chicago experience slower growth. Fargo, N.D., Sioux Falls, S.D., Des Moines and Bismarck, N.D., for example, all grew well faster than the national average throughout the past decade.

Economics undergirds this trend. Unemployment in the Great Plains has remained relatively low, even during the recession that began in 2007. For much of the decade, the biggest problem facing many businesses has been finding enough workers.

In the future, some will thrive by the production of energy or specialized manufactured products. Others will serve as magnets for tourists, hunters, bird-watchers, arts festivals and pageants. Small rural college towns may serve as refuges for empty nesters relocating or returning from the congested, expensive coasts.

The critical sources for the evolving resurgence of the Heartland lie both in new technology and traditional strengths.

The advent of the Internet, which has broken the traditional isolation of rural communities, has facilitated the movement of technology companies, business services and manufacturing firms to the nation’s interior. This will reinforce not so much a movement to remote hamlets but to the growing number of dynamic small cities and towns throughout the Heartland.

The other critical element concerns the traditional role of the Heartland as a producer of critical raw materials. As world competition for food and energy supplies intensifies, a critical primary advantage for the United States in contrast with China, India, Japan and the European Union will lie with the vast natural abundance of its Heartland regions.

New investment will flow back into the Heartland to tap previously difficult-to-access resources such as oil and gas, while new technologies will exploit prodigious natural sources such as wind.

Equally critical, the Heartland will reconnect America with its own historic strengths as a great, largely open, continental nation, a place of aspiration that can accommodate future growth. The Heartland reinforces our national character, what Frederick Jackson Turner called “that restless, nervous energy; that dominant individualism, working for good or evil ... that buoyancy and exuberance which comes with freedom.”

As the population expands to 400 million people, Americans will need to tap that spirit more than ever.

This article originally appeared at the Omaha World Herald.

Joel Kotkin is executive editor of NewGeography.com and is a distinguished presidential fellow in urban futures at Chapman University. He is author of The City: A Global History. His newest book is The Next Hundred Million: America in 2050, released in Febuary, 2010.

Photo by: Sacred Destinations

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Buffalo Commons

The article misunderstands the Buffalo Commons, as Dave Barnes comments. Anyone wanting more information about it should look at my Rutgers website, policy.rutgers.edu/faculty/popper. I and my wife Deborah Popper, a geographer at the College of Staten Island/City University of New York and Princeton University, originated the idea in 1987. The only national group explicitly trying to create the Buffalo Commons is the Texas-based Great Plains Restoration Council, gprc.org, whose president is Jarid Manos, greatplains@gprc.org. (Disclosure: I chair its board.) Another important group is the New Mexico-based National Center for Frontier Communities, frontierus.org, whose executive director is Carol Miller, carol@frontierus.org. (Deborah and I are on its board.) It advocates and does research on remote isolated communities, not just in the Great Plains or the West, but across the country. Best wishes,
Frank Popper
Rutgers and Princeton Universities
fpopper@rci.rutgers.edu, fpopper@princeton.edu
732-932-4009, X689

Buffalo Commons and city growth are not...

polar opposites.

The proposed are for the Buffalo Commons is immense.
Expanding the few cities in this area would have no effect on the concept.

For example, it is 700 miles from Denver (metro) to Kansas City (metro). There is not a single "real" city between the two. Think about it. 700 x 100 miles is 45 million acres. That is a lot of bison to turn into burgers.

Dave Barnes
+1.303.744.9024
http://www.MarketingTactics.com

Agree with Jim Fuqua

Note to Joel Kotkin: "The Heartland" is usually described as 'flyover country' beginning at Oklahoma City and endng at the Canadian border. I'd add Texas, especially the Dallas-Fort Worth area, to that "Heartland" description, Joel. Everything you said in your typically excellent article about the culture, economy and prospects for Fargo and Kansas City, etal, applies to Texas/Dallas as well. In many ways the success of DFW, and of Texas as a whole, signals the way for these more northern areas to embrace the easy, relaxed sophistication Texas has. Newcomers always welcomed as long as they 'get' chili and BBQ.

Cato The Eldest, a Texan by choice...not by birth.

Resurgence of the American Heartland

There has and continues to be great change in the "American Heartland". With the economic changes come changes changes in the people also.

I suspect that between 30% and 40% of the population in the Tennessee town in which I live are people who grew up outside the south. Many were born in other countries. The Nashville school system teaches children who speak about 28 different languages.

People who expect the Heartland culture to remain in the 1950s as the it changes economically will be disappointed. All Americans will become more alike.

Our local grocery even has a sushi chef and sells live lobsters. When I was a child here in the 40s and 50s even pizza was considered a bit exotic and foreign.

Jim Fuqua

Fargo and Growth

"As huge urbanized regions become less desirable or unaffordable for many businesses and middle-class families, more and more Americans will find their best future in the wide-open spaces that, even in 2050, will still exist across the continent. The beneficiaries will include places as diverse as Fargo and Sioux Falls in the Dakotas to Des Moines, Oklahoma City, Omaha and Kansas City."

I think you touch on it but don't seem to come out and say it ---> It's already happening. Fargo has wine bards and lofts downtown and the 3rd largest Microsoft campus.

Unless one is an absolute fanatic about theater or food or seeing top level pro sports in person, there isn't much of anything one can't find in Fargo let alone Omaha that isn't traditionally known as a big city amenity. One can get good beer in Sioux Falls, good sushi in Omaha, Egyptian food in Rochester, etc, etc. The same house that costs me $300k in MPLS or Chicago can be had for $200k in Omaha or Des Moines. What is there to miss out on by living in these cities besides high housing prices and traffic?