Why Trayvon Martin Defines Sanford, Florida

Sanford, FL by Christine Wood.JPG

For other rural cities in America, Sanford, Florida, home of the George Zimmerman trial, is useful as a cautionary tale: Define yourself now, before an incident like the shooting of Trayvon Martin defines you.

All of Florida is once again in an uncomfortable position, this time with the Zimmerman verdict. The state has by now earned a solid last-place position in its contribution to America’s culture. Its poor history was topped by its performance in the 2000 presidential election, but it includes lurid crimes going back well over a century. Most Florida residents quickly change the subject when the conversation gets around to asking what state you’re from, but Floridians must confront the fact – at least at home in the mirror, if not publicly – that we have a lot of hard work to do. Florida’s social ills, including racism, run deep. Its public-relations image as a tropical paradise of sandy beaches belies the real Florida lurking within, and its urban geography reflects a state that has still deep schisms that are not going away between residents.

When Henry Sanford built a railroad town in 1877, calling his place "the gateway to South Florida,” it quickly succeeded as a population magnet, swelling to a size far larger than sleepy Orlando by the turn of the century. Bustling with railroads, citrus, and celery, Sanford was a testbed for Spanish oranges, later sold as the “Valencia” variety. Like many Florida cities, it was home to both a black and a white population, and in 1891 the railroad workers to the west incorporated a new town called Goldsboro. One of the first African American towns in Florida, Goldsboro lasted twenty years until white Sanford petitioned to absorb it. Even a century ago, African-American urban success was a challenge to the status quo that was too much to stand.

Sanford lies on the northernmost edge of Seminole County, north of Orlando, a place named after a tribe whose history is another whole litany of sorrows. Today, it's a place of lakes, wetlands, and green rolling hills, with neighborhoods and commercial strips sandwiched in between — a sort of exurban enclave of Orlando, slightly more affluent than the average Florida household. A historic town, Sanford is a symbolic landmark more than a true city center, and suffers from being a bit too far from Orlando to be considered a realistic commute.

This unfavorable geography helped preserve the town’s distinctive historic architecture, as the forces of growth found more accessible real estate to develop elsewhere around it. Mostly new-ish, mostly white-ish subdivisions and commercial strips carve up the land along north/south corridors: US 441, Interstate 4, and US 17-92. Rural Florida has mostly been banished out of Seminole County by this miasma of growth that rings the north side of metropolitan Orlando.

Sanford preserved its downtown core and much of the surrounding neighborhood as National Historic Districts, keeping a strong sense of place but inhibiting modernization. Downtown, like a stage set waiting for players, hopes in vain for some kind of re-identification. Art galleries, restaurants and antique shops suggest a tourist destination, not a thriving, productive community. Second floor windows loom over Main Street with mostly empty eyes. The waterfront, a few blocks away, is absurdly disconnected from the downtown core. An obligatory six-story stucco condo — naturally almost empty — sits at the point where the city meets Lake Monroe, Sanford’s tribute to the great banking crisis of 2008.

Sanford’s struggle to survive has led to a grim sense of despair among many who gambled on development and continue to wait for the gentrification payoff. With the railroad and agriculture economy mostly gone, its quaint and highly affordable neighborhoods have yet to attract throngs seeking the good life.

So, in 2012, the city began a public campaign to reinvent itself. But the Trayvon Martin/ George Zimmerman case did this instead, tying Sanford to a troubling lack of progress in civil rights and race relations. It has laid bare the most difficult social problem in America, and pointed a fair share of blame squarely at Florida.

What happened in this case may be analyzed for some time to come, but it is not just a Sanford phenomenon. Florida’s geography seems to beget slightly deeper divisions than most other places do.
A have and have-not condition is almost certainly ingrained into the state’s subconscious culture. With over a thousand miles of coastline, half of which is beaches, Florida’s main contribution to the country’s economy is that of waterfront real estate; second homes for the wealthy and retirement communities. The interior is chock full of golf courses and theme parks that reinforce a sense of affluent leisure. This divides, not unites, into servant and served.

For the service workers in Florida, the living conditions are vastly different, with little or no upward mobility. A lack of connectivity between citizens, as well as low taxes, exacerbate problems in the state’s education system. Growth has created a big bottom, as well as a big top, with little investment in between.

Oceanfront condos and houses make good profits for lenders, and the state has gone from a glut to a bubble again. What this boom-bust economy may be doing, however, is helping to redefine Florida as a sort of third-world economy, uncomfortably latched to the underbelly of America. Anyone traveling to leisure destinations in the Caribbean, Asia, or much of South America may recall venturing off the hotel property, only to be immediately struck by a different living standard. Such a difference is striking overseas. Here in the Sunshine State, it's more subtle: a little less emphasis on schools, a little less melting-pot culture, a little more politically regressive… nothing one might notice while here on vacation. But it has been eating away at society’s veneer over time, and the Zimmerman trial has cast a harsh light on the realities in much of Florida.

With its emphasis on tourism and growth, Florida will remain a geography of privilege. For the unprivileged, it is a state of danger that is getting worse all the time. Gun law makes this land of sunshine and warm weather a cold, harsh place if you are not on the golf course, tanning on the sand, or in your beachfront condo.

And for those who want to make this place better? We have a lot of very hard work ahead if we are going to rebuild a state of compassion and shared ownership out of the ashes of our contemporary culture.

Richard Reep is an architect and artist who lives in Winter Park, Florida. His practice has centered around hospitality-driven mixed use, and he has contributed in various capacities to urban mixed-use projects, both nationally and internationally, for the last 25 years.

Photo by Christine Wood


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.


What's a "rural city"? Is that anything like jumbo shrimp?


I read this article hoping to find out why Trayvon Martin defines Sanford, Florida as the title promised. It didn't... as if it could. Instead, what I found was a curmudgeonly rant, incoherent and full of sweeping, unsubstantiated claims.

It may be the author's point that Sanford is defined by Trayvon Martin because no one has heard of Sanford otherwise? Well, obviously. As the author's tortured description reveals, Sanford is just like any of a thousand towns dating back to the nineteenth century on the fringe of a large metropolitan area in this country.

If anything, the Trayvon Martin case is proof that this country has truly, finally banished racism. Apparently we are so bereft of incidents that demonstrate racism, many people feel compelled to pretend any crime against a person of color, real or imagined and despite the lack of any evidence of such, indicates lingering Jim Crow attitudes.

Oh, and the author is opposed to class divisions as well so Trayvon Martin is about that too. And its destroying the Sunshine State's society; but unfortunately only the author is perceptive enough to see it. I would argue that Florida is not a third world country, racist, or a cold harsh place for those not on a golf course. It is a actually a vast, strange mirror that reflects a person's prejudices and bugbears.

"Apparently we are so bereft

"Apparently we are so bereft of incidents that demonstrate racism, many people feel compelled to pretend any crime against a person of color, real or imagined and despite the lack of any evidence of such, indicates lingering Jim Crow attitudes."

Well put.

Yes, there are issues in black life. But white racism isn't one of them. The white bigotry, of low expectation, can be defined as racist, since it maintains the economic and social status quo of Black Americans. But only Americans on the Left raise or drop standards, for people, on the basis of their skin color.

You said it

I agree, that was very well put by DB1984.

And your longer comment below, Market and Church.

I won't try and put my 50 cents worth in because all I need to say now is that I agree with you.

Bill Whittle and his team seems to have done some genuine investigative journalism on this, in contrast to the agenda-serving lamestream media.


Philbest, that is very

Philbest, that is very intimidating to see those facts that bill brings to light, was not mentioned by any of the major networks or papers. It is very scary that real life first goes through the filter of a boardroom, with interpreters, who then frame a narrative in how we "ought" to view things.

My friend Gil Reich reported this bastardization of the lamestream media, from the President's conference in Israel, wherein the heads of HBO and MSNBC acknowledged that they have no choice but to be political. Funny how the fact that they can't help but be political, means that they all then tow the same Leftist line? I gave four lengthy rants in the comment section, spelling out the hypocrisy in all of it:


I disagree.

I disagree fully with the way this article frames the situation.

Sanford would not be on the map, and no one would know of Treyvon Martin, if the killer of Treyvon had been a fellow black. The NYTimes had to "frame" this as a white-on-black crime, to foment the anger, which drove the preoccupation, with this case. The man isn't even white, and he is certainly no more white then Barack Obama is white... but we don't call Barack Obama "half-Kenyan," or "half-white." The race of the perpetrator of a crime, and the race of the victim of a crime, determines whether the press thinks, that we, as a society, should care, and take notice... or not. Our selective journalism is why you never hear on the infinitely more common occurrence, of black-on-black crime, and black-on-white crime. But serious white-on-black crime? Give me a break! It's almost non-existent...

The Left has tried to frame America as not having changed one bit, since the Jim Crow South. They tried with Twana Brawly, and we discovered that was a hoax. They tried with Duke Lacrosse. They tried with Gena 6. They finally found an isolated event, which they could frame, as indicative, of their libel against America, and are milking it for all its worth... even while 200 blacks have been slaughtered on the streets of Chicago, by blacks, in the last 7 months alone.

This is nothing more then a social crusade, on the part of the Left, to rectify justice, on behalf of their trinity, of Race, Gender, and Class. There will be another Treyvon... another Sandra Fluke, another Christopher Dorner, another Tyler Clementi, another Duke Lacrosse, until we accept their narrative, that we're all basically racists, sexists, homophobes, xenophobes, classists, bigots, Islamophobes, deep down, but are just unaware of it, and... But now that we've been enlightened by them of our inherent bigotries, we should therefore move to rectify justice, by affirmative action policies, that "equalizes" power through representation, across the board, of the disenfranchised. And they will not stop calling us all of those epithets, unless there is 50% women sitting on the boards of Microsoft, and Boeing, and a percentage of blacks, proportionate to their percentage of the population, in the upper and middle class. Equality of outcome is to be lived out in every facet of life, for them to chill out, and leave society alone. So they will not stop, because they cannot stop. Even when they reach this utopia, they will discover that you have to kill a few million people, and rule them under a fascist dictatorship, to maintain that level of equality.

Sanford may have its problems. But racism is not one of them. The issue is generational impoverishment, black-insularity, a breakdown of Black Family life, and Democrats/Liberals who have done virtually nothing, for blacks they claim to represent. Nothing. Blacks from Ethiopia and South Africa, move into the lower middle class, usually within one generation, and their children have employment and usually a middle-class standing, and put their own children through college. Blacks haven't been able to do that, for the last 60 years, and Liberal politicians are at fault for this. It is an embarrassment! Blacks have been sold a bill of goods. It's time to reconsider their allegiance to those with empty promise, versed in the art of rhetoric, but offering nothing more then lip service in exchange for power.

Way, way off

Interesting diatribe.

Most Floridians I know are not -- as apparently is the author -- filled with self-loathing or hatred for their state. And while every state has a mix of people and neighborhoods, whenever we visit, folks seem, in general, to be fairly pleasant. Maybe it's the weather.

Talking about stark contrasts, could it be the author is channeling Baltimore?