NewGeography.com blogs

NGVideo: East St. Louis (Part I)

The first in a series of videos about the economic, political, and cultural history and future of East St. Louis, Illinois.


Part II gives views of downtown today, shows how its history can be seen in the city, and explains why the city could still be a good place for new development.

Michael R. Allen is the Assistant Director at Landmarks Association of St. Louis. He edits the blog Ecology of Absence, "a voice for historic preservation and a chronicle of architectural change in St. Louis, Missouri and its region".

Alex Lotz is an undergraduate film student in his final year at Chapman University.

Wall Street Brain Drain May Not Be All Bad

President Obama’s recent executive compensation plan comes on the heels of the revelation that Wall Street firms awarded over $18 billion in bonuses last year. The plan will create a $500,000 pay cap for executives at companies receiving substantial taxpayer bailout money.

While the Wall Street salary cap – certainly well intentioned – mirrors public sentiment nationwide, the Masters of the Universe and their friends are not so pleased. Some feel it is a “killer for New York.” Kathryn Wilde of the Partnership for New York argues the lower salaries on Wall Street will lead to a “critical brain drain” in the industry and “lower tax revenues for the city and state.”

But in the longer run, is this all bad? The so-called “brain drain” of high priced talent – the same folks who got us in trouble in the first place – could be fortuitous if more creative and innovative professionals now arrive on Wall Street. A new breed of Wall Streeter might have the potential to create a sustainable industry rather than the current casino culture. What may be a superficial wound on NYC in the short term may benefit the country as a whole – and even New York – in long run.

More than Two-thirds of the Nation Still Lives in Their Home State

In which states do folks tend to stay home? Here's a look at Americans still living in their birth states. New York and Louisiana top the list. Upwards of 82% of the US-born residents living in New York and Louisiana were born there. Looking at the map, you can see that the highest numbers reside in the rust belt and northeast. The most transplants tend to live in natural amenity rich western states, except for California.

More than 72% of US born Californians were born in the state. That number is over 74% in LA county, but only about 60% in San Diego. Other high transplant areas include New Hampshire and Vermont in the northeast, and not surprisingly the Washington DC area, Florida, and Nevada.

Only 41.7% of US born Alaskans were born there. I suppose if you are living in Alaska, you've come there for good reason.

Take a look at an extension of this analysis: Does a low number of home staters mean everyone has left?


Percent of Native Population Born in their Current State of Residence
Geographic area Percent Margin of Error
New York 82.1 +/-0.1
Louisiana 82 +/-0.2
Michigan 80.6 +/-0.1
Pennsylvania 79.6 +/-0.1
Ohio 77.8 +/-0.1
Illinois 77.4 +/-0.1
Iowa 75.4 +/-0.3
Wisconsin 75.3 +/-0.2
Massachusetts 74.7 +/-0.2
Minnesota 73.8 +/-0.2
Kentucky 73.6 +/-0.2
Mississippi 73.4 +/-0.3
Alabama 73.2 +/-0.3
West Virginia 72.9 +/-0.3
Texas 72.3 +/-0.1
North Dakota 72.1 +/-0.4
California 71.8 +/-0.1
Indiana 71.4 +/-0.2
Nebraska 69.7 +/-0.3
Missouri 68.9 +/-0.2
Utah 68.5 +/-0.3
Rhode Island 67.9 +/-0.6
South Dakota 67.5 +/-0.5
United States 67.3 +/-0.1
Maine 66.5 +/-0.5
Hawaii 65.6 +/-0.5
New Jersey 65.4 +/-0.2
Tennessee 65 +/-0.2
Oklahoma 64.8 +/-0.2
North Carolina 64.1 +/-0.2
Connecticut 64 +/-0.3
Arkansas 63.8 +/-0.3
South Carolina 63.4 +/-0.3
Kansas 62.7 +/-0.3
Georgia 61.5 +/-0.2
New Mexico 57 +/-0.4
Virginia 56.3 +/-0.2
Montana 55.3 +/-0.5
Maryland 54.6 +/-0.3
Vermont 54.5 +/-0.5
Washington 53.7 +/-0.2
Oregon 50.2 +/-0.3
Delaware 50 +/-0.6
Idaho 48.7 +/-0.4
Colorado 46.9 +/-0.3
District of Columbia 45.5 +/-0.7
New Hampshire 44.4 +/-0.4
Wyoming 43.3 +/-0.8
Alaska 41.7 +/-0.6
Arizona 41.7 +/-0.3
Florida 41.4 +/-0.1
Nevada 27.8 +/-0.4

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2005-2007 American Community Survey

A (New) Place to Call Home

A recent survey by Pew Research finds that nearly half of Americans (46%) "would rather live in a different type of community from the one they're living in now," with those living in cities expressing the highest desire to live elsewhere.

Even though many Americans say they are interested in giving somewhere new a try, most of us seem to think that our current communities aren't so bad. According to Pew, over 80% of respondents rated their current community as excellent, very good, or good. The survey also reports that "ideal community type" was not dominated by any one class of place, with 30% preferring small towns, 25% suburbs, 23% cities, and 21% rural areas.

Pew also asked those surveyed about their interest in living in specific big cities. Denver came out on top, with 43% of respondents stating that they would be interested in living in its metro area. Other western cities also fared quite well, with seven of the top ten "popular" cities being located in the west. The remainder of the top ten was made up of southern cities. Cities in the north and east lagged behind in popularity, with the rustbelt cities of Detroit and Cleveland registering the lowest popularity. (8% and 10%)

Subjects:

MC Bailout

Thanks to Steve Bartin for pointing out this hilarious bailout video, which then led me to The Daily Bail, a new site looking at the lighter side of the financial crisis. Stockbroker thuglife? Good stuff.


Subjects: