Atlanta area voters said "no" to a proposed $7 billion transportation tax that was promoted as a solution to the metropolitan area's legendary traffic congestion, despite a campaign in which supporters outspent opponents by more than 500 to one.
With 99 percent of the precincts reporting, the Atlanta Journal Constitution reported that the measure lost 63% to 37%. This 26% margin of loss was nearly three times the margin shown in most recent poll by the Journal-Constitution. Proponents had claimed on the weekend that the measure was "dead even" three days before the election.
Proponents spent heavily on the campaign, with reports ranging up to $8.5 million in campaign donations, indicating a cost to contributors of more than $30 per vote. Opponents raised less than $15,000.
The tax issue failed in all 10 counties. The defeats were modest in Fulton County (the core county, which includes most of the city of Atlanta) and DeKalb County (which contains the rest of Atlanta). Huge "no" vote margins were recorded in the largest suburban counties. In Gwinnett County, the no votes prevailed by a margin of 71% to 29%. In adjacent Cobb County, the margin was 69% to 31%.
On election morning, the Atlanta-Journal Constitution featured opposing commentaries by regional planning agency (Atlanta Regional Commission) Chairman Tad Leithead and me. Chairman Leithead stressed the view that the tax would lead to reduced traffic congestion, job creation and economic development. My column stressed the view that the disproportionate spending on transit (53 percent of the money for one percent of the travel market) would not reduce traffic congestion.
Email this Blog entry
I have read your article, it
I have read your article, it is very informative and helpful for me.I admire the valuable information you offer in your articles. Thanks for posting it..
mobile advertising cpm
_Visit: tu van dau tu nuoc
_Visit: tu van dau tu nuoc ngoai, cong bo thuc pham, thiet ke website ban hang, thanh lap cong ty, dang ky nhan hieu, cong bo luu hanh my pham...
thanks for this usefull
thanks for this usefull article, waiting for this article like this again.
Welcome to Betty's Empire
I recently came across your
I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.
Medical Simulation Consulting
Personal Bankruptcy
It should be the entity with the LOWEST costs but that doesn't happen. Largely due to politics.
Personal Bankruptcy
Thanks for the post. Just
Thanks for the post. Just the right thing I need for my report! I learnda lots! Keep on posting!!
boracay travel tour package
boracay tours
זמנים באנגלית
I have been searching and found here. I am regular visotor of this site. You should keep it up forever.
זמנים באנגלית
Druckerei für Wiederverkäufer
The entities with the highest costs is the spending standard from then on. It should be the entity with the LOWEST costs but that doesn't happen. Largely due to politics.
Druckerei für Wiederverkäufer
cheers for the actual
cheers for the actual article i have recently been on the lookout with regard to this kind of advice on the net for sum time right now so many thanks
pure garcinia
I really appreciate this
I really appreciate this wonderful post that you have provided for us. I assure this would be beneficial for most of the people.
video production house
אנגלית שוטפת בחודשיים רק בהיי-קיו
The entities with the highest costs is the spending standard from then on. It should be the entity with the LOWEST costs but that doesn't happen. Largely due to politics.
אנגלית שוטפת בחודשיים רק בהיי-קיו
Help Full Consultant
Its very useful information for me. I have been searching and found here. I am regular visotor of this site. You should keep it up forever
accountmanager bedrijven
What would Atlanta say yes to that would address congestion?
Wendell, how much of the no vote is:
1: no to "53% of revenue to 1% of travel"
2: confusion
3: no to taxes. period
4: no to whatever government asks. period
The news video you linked to makes it sound like mostly #1 and #2, but I am suspecting a lot of #3 and #4, as well.
The suggestion that "back to the drawing board and maybe tolls and more gas tax", will not only not solve the problem, but it will also be voted "no".
Atlanta needs a little of "all of the above" which would only make a future poll more complex and still need more tax and will still get a "no" vote.
Do you see a solution?
Bern Grush
grushhour.com