Rust Belt: Can Micro-Suburbs Stay Independent?

East Cleveland streetsign.JPG

The Ohio suburb of East Cleveland abuts the core city to its west and north, and in terms of physical appearance the boundary between the two is indistinct. A century ago, the City of Cleveland unsuccessfully attempted to annex East Cleveland on two occasions. These days, Cleveland is unlikely to perceive its eastern neighbor as much of a catch. East Cleveland fell on hard times during the deindustrialization that took place throughout the Cuyahoga Valley: since 1970, it has lost more than half of its population. Nearly 40% of the 2010 population falls below the poverty level.

East Cleveland’s residents and depressed real estate do not contribute a tax base by which the city can provide fundamental services. In this way, it's no different than numerous exceedingly small towns and micro suburbs scattered nationwide. Can it — and other places like it — survive? And, if so, how?

East Cleveland's 'solution' is to shift the burden to motorists by tackling them with hefty speeding tickets. The 2.5-mile stretch of Euclid Avenue that passes through town is one of the city's few revenue-raisers; a sidewalk sign promises camera monitoring and $90 speeding tickets.

East Cleveland is a “Community of Strict Enforcement” that may not have high road fatalities, but the city’s socioeconomics give it few other options to generate the revenue it needs. The placard on the sidewalk (seen above) undoubtedly owes its existence to the debacle that a few years back brought about the demise of another Ohio town, New Rome.

New Rome, outside Columbus, was a tiny village of only about nine city blocks (approximately twelve acres) that, even at its peak, no more than 150 people called home; the 2000 Census estimated its population at 60. It would probably have gone completely ignored if it weren’t for a four-block stretch of U.S. 40 (West Broad Street in Columbus) that fell within the town's corporate limits. Within New Rome’s 1000-foot segment of highway, the speed limit dropped from 45 mph to 35. The New Rome Police Department had every right to issue $90 citations to motorists going 42 mph within this speed trap — and it did. The village of a dozen ramshackle houses, three apartment buildings, and a handful of small businesses earned nearly all its revenue from traffic tickets. With no other real public agencies, the money paid for the police force (which at times had as many as 14 employees, one quarter of the then-population) and the village council.

A few neighbors eventually grew so frustrated that they launched the website New Rome Sucks. And after a series of corruption revelations, the town attracted the attention of the Franklin County Prosecutor and Ohio Attorney General Jim Petro, who determined that, after decades of incompetent management, New Rome should be abolished. Eventually, Petro convinced the Ohio General Assembly to pass a law allowing the state to seek dissolution of a village under 150 people if the State Auditor found that it provided few public services and demonstrated a pattern of wrongdoing. In 2004, the Village of New Rome was irrevocably absorbed into Prairie Township of Franklin County, Ohio.

In most municipalities, good governance is a selling point. However, New Rome’s malfeasance was unequivocally a reflection of the will of its constituents. They got the racket that a majority of them apparently wanted. And eventually the village forfeited its very existence.

While a New Rome could realistically emerge anywhere in the country, it is worth questioning whether the municipal incorporation structure in Ohio — and other states — particularly abets the process. Tiny municipalities exist everywhere. But they seem particularly prevalent in the industrial heartland. Cleveland’s Cuyahoga County has 57 incorporated municipalities; Columbus’ Franklin County has 25; Cincinnati’s Hamilton County has 38. Most states to Ohio’s northeast are almost completely incorporated: William Penn mandated this characteristic in his original charter for Pennsylvania. New Jersey is 99% incorporated. It is not uncommon to find boroughs as small as New Rome in both of these states; the Philadelphia suburb of Millbourne, for example, measures only .07 square miles.

Conversely, southern states are more likely to opt for either expanses of unincorporated urbanized land (which characterizes the vast New Orleans suburb of Metairie) or mega-municipalities, such as the “town” of Gilbert outside Phoenix, with a population over 200,000.

The majority of shrinking cities — and towns, villages, boroughs, and townships — now are clustered in the Northeast and the Midwest. "Home Rule" provisions in the Ohio state constitution, and similar legislation elsewhere in these regions, coupled with a small population, allow for a disproportionate amount of self-actualization… for better or worse. Cleveland’s most prosperous micro-suburbs have wielded it effectively to stem the erosion of their tax base.

Does this broad-brush distinction between North and South yield any conclusions? At the very least, Rust Belt states must carefully weigh the benefits of entitling tiny populations to remain as independent towns. Otherwise, the only way many communities in a metropolitan mosaic will ever paint themselves out of the red is through surreptitious speed traps.

Eric McAfee is an itinerant urban planner/emergency manager who fuses his cross county (and trans-national) travels and love of contemporary landscapes into his blog, American Dirt, where a different version of this article appeared.

Photo in East Cleveland by the author.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

You'll clearly discover a

You'll clearly discover a suitable seo services for your website on the Internet.

Great Article it its really

Great Article it its really informative and innovative keep us posted with new updates. I feel that you should write extra on this subject, it may not be a taboo subject but typically individuals are not sufficient to talk on such topics.You've provide helpful details and it completes with a great reference to keep. cheap soundcloud plays

Web sites, email promotions,

Web sites, email promotions, Online seminars and pay-per-click strategy control are just a few illustrations of this, in addition to weblogs, podcasts, and user-generated content. discover this info here

How To Clean Your Own Pool

Great blog. Thank you for for sharing so great thing to us. I definitely enjoying every little bit of it I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you post nice post.

Pool Supplies Near Orlando

Superb Information,Thanks

Superb Information,Thanks for posting this. Your blog is so interesting and very informative.
Swimming Pool Stain Removal

My greeting from New

My greeting from New York.
Thanks fot useful post.

Thanks for writing such a

Thanks for writing such a good article, I stumbled onto your blog and read a few post. I like your style of writing...
cheapest facebook likes

Revenue for traffic tickets

It doesn't matter the size of the communities, when you raise revenue from fines, and it becomes the biggest or at least a large part of your income it will lead to abuse. There is no question about that, its human nature. The ticket trap towns are everywhere, in fact there are websites where people can compile them. Out of town motorists aren't voters so they cannot vote the corruption out.

There is the same problem with property seizure too. That is abused often too. It makes the police jump the gun and it has been causing corruption.

The reality is that fines and seizures cannot go to the departments that took in the money.

In my area a town was running its own traffic court, which is illegal in my state. It only was uncovered because they weren't splitting the money with the county (which runs the real traffic court). And this wasn't a town with money problems (its a wealthy community).


Where are your references for your claims about these "speed traps" being an important source of revenue? People have long complained about traffic and parking tickets being a cash cow for city's. Yet for most city's they'd barely notice if those tickets weren't issues.

For example, a city like Rochester MN has a budget of @$50million. Revenue from traffic tickets wasn't even high enough to be an item in their budget overview. The revenue from parking tickets was @$375,000. That's pretty much bupkiss compared to $50m.

It's all relative...

Rochester MN had a population of approximately 85,000 in the 2000 Census; New Rome, OH had 60 people at that same time. (I can't apply the 2010 Census, because by that point New Rome had ceased to exist.)

Thus, a city of over 1400X the size of New Rome generated approximately the same amount of revenue for citations. In New Rome's case, only 12% went for speeding; the rest included citations for cracked windshields, chipped taillights, faulty mufflers, or dirt on the license plate. The overwhelmingly majority of New Rome's annual revenue came from citing motorists as they passed through.

Here's the best source that I could find: