Communities Need to Build Better Millennial Connections


A remarkable, but mostly unnoticed, 2012 study found a powerful correlation between a community’s civic health and its economic well being. The analysis by the National Conference on Citizenship (NCoC) and its partners found that the density of non-profits whose purpose was to encourage their members’ participation within the community   correlated strongly with the ability of a locality to withstand the effects of the Great Recession. The same analysis revealed that those municipalities having the greatest amount of “social cohesion,” defined as “interacting frequently with friends, family members, and neighbors,” also showed greater resilience in ameliorating job losses during economic downturns, independent of the density of their non-profit sector.

The numbers are startling. States with high social cohesion had unemployment rates two percentage points lower than their less connected counterparts, even controlling for demographics and economic factors. A county with just one additional nonprofit per 1,000 people in 2005 had half a percentage point less unemployment in 2009. And for individuals who held jobs in 2008, the odds of becoming unemployed were cut in half if they lived in a community with many nonprofit organizations rather than one with only a few, even if  the two communities were otherwise similar. Given these results, every community interested in improving its economic vitality should be devising strategies to increase the civic health of their locality.

One way to accomplish this goal is to attract members of the hyper-connected but locally-focused Millennial Generation (born 1982-2003).  People in their thirties – a group millennials are just entering but will soon dominate – and early forties, the age when people are building families and careers, constitute the essential social ballast for any community, city or suburb. For the rest of this decade as well as the next, Millennials will comprise the cohort entering this key phase of life, contributing both economic stimulus and a new sense of community wherever they choose to live. Fortuitously, the same organization (NCoC) that produced the original report has just released a new study suggesting several strategies cities could use to attract America’s most community-oriented generation.

According to this year’s study, more densely populated communities face a major challenge in attracting civic-oriented Millennials. This is contrary to much of the conventional wisdom about both millennials and “community”.  It found that members of the generation who reside in denser urban communities are less likely to engage in the type of service activities that nonprofits are designed to encourage. Except in the South, Millennials living in suburbia or more rural settings were more likely to engage in service activities with their peers than their urban counterparts. In fact, the worst community participation rates by far were found among Millennials in the country’s Northeastern cities.

A recent analysis by demographer Wendell Cox of Millennial living patterns validated these findings. He found that those major metropolitan areas with the least density gained the lion’s share of increases in populations of 25 to 34 year olds in the first decade of this century. Another, as yet unpublished study by Cox, has found that the same holds true for 20-24 year olds. 

To fix that problem and increase their economic resiliency, more densely populated communities should actively encourage the formation of military veteran’s groups and other nonprofits that foster citizen participation and leadership skills. Other types of nonprofits that the earlier NCoC study suggested would help improve a city’s civic and economic vitality are sports clubs, labor unions and those that offer job-training opportunities. By providing such nonprofits with the space and resources to attract and engage America’s largest and most diverse generation, communities can gain the economic benefits that service organizations, such as Kiwanis and the Elks, brought to their communities in the past.

A recent review of the seven best cities for Millennials to obtain an initial foothold for their economic future placed greater Seattle at the top of the list. It was followed by Dallas; Minneapolis; Athens, Georgia; Ithaca, New York; Oklahoma City; and Phoenix.  () Most of these communities combine relatively lower levels of density with lower rates of unemployment making them especially attractive to Millennials.  

One way for denser urban centers to compete with such localities is to gain a broad mix of educational attainment among their younger populations, thereby increasing their social cohesion and, ultimately, economic resiliency. This is because Millennials without a high school diploma are least likely to trust their neighbors but most likely to help those very same neighbors on a regular basis. Meanwhile, Millennials who attend college become more trusting of their neighbors wherever they end up settling, but less likely to help them out. In order to build both a trusting community and one where friends and neighbors help each other out, communities need to provide a broad range of jobs requiring various levels of education and encourage Millennials to stay in the place where they grew up or return there upon graduation.

Communities interested in enhancing their social cohesion should take a close look at the example set by the civic leaders of Kalamazoo, Michigan. Under its Kalamazoo Promise program, families that enroll their children in the local school district get help with college tuition on a sliding scale based on how many grades of education the child completes in the city’s schools. The strategy, which has led to greater demand for housing within the school district’s boundaries as well, encourages the development of a community with a wide range of educational success among its residents.  

The most recent study also found that once Millennials complete their schooling and begin to settle down their civic engagement increases. In fact, those 29 and under who are married and have children are more likely than those over thirty who do not have a family to participate in activities, such as helping neighbors, that in turn lead to greater social cohesion.

One strategy for encouraging college educated Millennials to settle in the community where they grew up, may lie with making the cost of college locally more affordable. For example, in contrast to many states that are shortsightedly reducing their subsidies of in state tuition, North Dakota is using some of its increased tax revenue from the state’s explosion in energy production to limit tuition increases for their residents and increasing the amount of needs-based tuition aid and scholarships for those who decide to attend any college in the state.

Building better communities requires encouraging the human interaction and connectivity that make a municipality more resilient in times of economic difficulty. Building this type of social capital comes naturally to Millennials, the nation’s most connected generation.   Non-profits that attract younger people should be actively encouraged to set up shop in cities and localities across the country. Programs that support educational attainment and employment opportunities for Millennials should be viewed as another essential element of economic strategy.  Today, community’s economic health is inextricably intertwined with the type of civic vitality that local Millennials can generate.  

Morley Winograd and Michael D. Hais are co-authors of the newly published Millennial Momentum: How a New Generation is Remaking America and Millennial Makeover: MySpace, YouTube, and the Future of American Politics and fellows of NDN and the New Policy Institute.

Homes image by BigStock.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

i have a good time reading

i have a good time reading this article and I think understanding the millennial generation and its impact on urban economics is essential. And social cohesion properly defined (strictly volunteer efforts, communities working together, etc.) could be a good measure of the health of a region.Building better communities requires encouraging the human interaction and connectivity that make a municipality more resilient in times of economic difficulty, Purchase Reverbnation Packages

Communities interested in

Communities interested in enhancing their social cohesion in social site like this .Real Reverbnation Services

Every communities must have

Every communities must have their own better Millennial Connections by which they can use on their future activities.

Unintended consequences?

Overall, I enjoyed this article and I think understanding the millennial generation and its impact on urban economics is essential. And social cohesion properly defined (strictly volunteer efforts, communities working together, etc.) could be a good measure of the health of a region.

However, I think the correlation between "density of non-profits" and low unemployment is suspect. Over the past 10-15 years there has been explosive growth in new non-profits and "social enterprise" organizations and many people, particularly young people, are choosing the non-profit life as a career as opposed to being a part-time purely volunteer effort. Ask any non-profit board member today and they will tell you that one of the biggest areas of concern is the competition for financial resources (donations) with other non-profits.

So my guess is that non-profits proliferate in areas where there already is strong economic growth and corresponding lower unemployment thereby creating the financial resources to provide the donor support. Additionally, not-for-profits and social enterprise organizations deploy these resources towards paying staff further reducing unemployment.

Last, in the long term, the proliferation of non-profits may not be as optimal as it may appear on the surface (after all, what is not to like about organizations helping others, right?) Like government, they do not have their own money and they also pay no taxes, including property taxes in the regions in which they reside. So they "extract" resources from both the government and the private sector to fund their missions. There are actually jurisdictions today that struggle to replace the loss of property tax revenue when non-profits move into buildings previously paying property tax. To be clear, this is not to denigrate not-for-profit missions which are universally noble, it is just to point out that they are not exempt from the law of unintended consequences.

Possibly, when you look at purely volunteer organizations (some of which you mentioned in the article), as distinct from the generalized category of non-profits, you might have a better correlated indicator of social cohesion and corresponding economic vitality.